Understanding the Difference Between Soft and Hard Economic Data

Balloon

Photo Credit: Aaron Burden, Unsplash

As trade policy changes, soft and hard economic data are back in the news. Soft data, such as surveys, measures sentiment, expectations, intentions, and how respondents feel about the economy. In contrast, hard data measures actual results and activity, such as production, spending, and job growth. While they typically move together, there are periods of heightened uncertainty where they can diverge, such as today. This month’s chart focuses on the difference between soft and hard economic data and discusses how to interpret their recent divergence.

The chart below ranks ten soft economic indicators as a percentile relative to the past five years. The yellow bar shows the average soft dataset ranks in the 27th percentile, highlighting broad-based weakness in sentiment and expectations. Starting at the bottom, consumer sentiment and CEO confidence surveys rank in the zero percentile, reflecting increased uncertainty. In the housing market, builder sentiment is weak as high mortgage rates and home prices weigh on home demand. Further up the list, the Dallas and New York Fed surveys reinforce the cautious business outlook. The Philadelphia Fed survey at the top appears notably less optimistic than the other two surveys. Still, it is important to note that the Philadelphia survey was conducted in early May, after the 90-day tariff pause was announced. The divergence is a good example of how quickly soft data can change in response to new information. Bank lending standards and small business optimism are also near the top and appear to be outliers, but that is because they have both recovered from weaker periods in 2022-2023, when the Fed was raising interest rates.

In contrast, the second chart tells a more optimistic story based on ten hard economic indicators. The yellow bar shows an average rank in the 78th percentile, signaling continued economic growth. At the top, company payrolls, bank lending, and consumer spending all rank in the 100th percentile, reflecting steady job growth, active credit markets, and solid consumer spending. Manufacturing and industrial data and construction activity are also strong, with durable goods orders and shipments and construction spending all in the 98th percentile. Moving toward the bottom, we start to see areas of softness. Jobless claims rank in the 51st percentile, with unemployment claims still low but rising. In the housing market, building permits and housing starts show the pace of activity continues to slow from pandemic highs.

The data tells a mixed story: soft data indicates cautious sentiment, while hard data shows that actual economic activity remains solid. Both data types are valuable, but it is important to understand their uses and limitations. Soft data can influence sentiment and behavior, but hard data ultimately drives corporate earnings and economic growth. Soft data is like next week’s weather forecast. It gives you a sense of what to expect but is not always accurate. Hard data is like looking out the window. It tells you what’s happening now. Given how quickly conditions are changing, our team is tracking both datasets to keep a clear view of the economy.


Soft Economic Data (Current Percentile vs Last 5 Years)

US Soft Economic Figures

Hard Economic Data (Current Percentile vs Last 5 Years)

US Hard Economic Figures
 

Important Disclosures
This material is provided for general and educational purposes only and is not investment advice. Your investments should correspond to your financial needs, goals, and risk tolerance. Please consult an investment professional before making any investment or financial decisions or purchasing any financial, securities, or investment-related service or product, including any investment product or service described in these materials.


Our Insights

Jonathan M. Elliott, CPWA®, CRPC®, CDFA®, ChSNC®, CPFA™, RMA®

I am currently the Managing Partner for our independent investment advisory firm, Optima Capital Management. Together with my business partners, Todd Bendell CFP® and Clinton Steinhoff, we founded Optima Capital in 2019 as a forward-thinking wealth management firm that serves as an investment fiduciary and family office for high-net-worth individuals and families. In addition to being the Chief Compliance Officer, my role at Optima Capital is portfolio management. I have over 22 years of experience in managing investment strategies and portfolios. I specialize in using fundamental and technical analysis to build custom portfolios that utilize individual equities, bonds, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). I began my financial services career with Merrill Lynch in 2003. At Merrill, I served in the leadership roles of Market Sales Manager and Senior Resident Director for the Scottsdale West Valley Market in Arizona. On Wall Street Magazine recognized me as one of the Top 100 Branch Managers in 2017. I am originally from Saginaw, Michigan, and a marketing graduate from the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University. I am a Certified Private Wealth Advisor® professional. The CPWA® certification program is an advanced credential created specifically for wealth managers who work with high net worth clients, focusing on the life cycle of wealth: accumulation, preservation, and distribution. In addition, I hold the following designations - Chartered Retirement Planning Counselor (CRPC®), Certified Divorce Financial Analyst (CDFA®), Certified Plan Fiduciary Advisor (CPFA), and Retirement Management Advisor (RMA®). In the community, I am a member of the Central Arizona Estate Planning Council (CAEPC) and serve as an alumni advisor and mentor to student organizations at Arizona State University. My interests include traveling, outdoors, fitness, leadership, entrepreneurship, minimalism, and computer science.

Previous
Previous

Risk-On, China Trade Deal, Soft vs Hard Economic Data

Next
Next

Trade Deficit Weighs on GDP, Labor Market Remains Solid, and Fed Holds Rates Steady